humanoidmetric.com
Independent humanoid-robot metrics · Xodexa
HMX v2.0.0
175 robots · 93 companies · 9 categories

Every humanoid robot, ranked and compared on the evidence.

An independent, transparent benchmark of general-purpose humanoid robots. Every robot is scored 0–100 by the Humanoid Metric (HMX) across six weighted pillars — autonomy, manipulation, mobility, hardware, commercial readiness and ecosystem — using only published specs, each one cited.

175
Robots ranked
93
Companies
93
In production / pilot
20
Countries

156 of those are humanoids, scored on the HMX. The other 19 sit in 8 further categories — quadrupeds, cobots, AMRs, aerial, marine, heavy, surgical and domestic — each scored on its own index, never a borrowed humanoid one.

THE WORLD IN MOTION

The Robotics Brief.

The discoveries, deployments and ideas moving robotics forward.

Sep 14, 15:27 UTC

300 of 300 recent stories

Top 5 humanoids by HMX

Full leaderboard →
#RobotStatusAutonomyHMX
1
🇺🇸 Figure 03Figure AI
commercial task-autonomous 87.0
2
🇺🇸 Optimus Gen 3Tesla
limited-production supervised-autonomy 85.1
3
🇺🇸 Atlas (electric)Boston Dynamics
pilot task-autonomous 84.8
4
🇩🇪 Agile ONEAgile Robots
pilot task-autonomous 81.2
5
🇨🇳 L7RobotEra (Beijing Xingdong Jiyuan / 星动纪元)
commercial task-autonomous 80.4

What else the index covers

Beyond humanoids

175 robots sit in 9 categories, from quadrupeds and cobots to surgical and marine platforms. Each category has its own index and its own reference scales — QMX for quadrupeds, MMX for manipulators, MRMX for mobile robots — because a quadruped's 71 and a humanoid's 71 answer different questions.

Browse every category →

The parts behind the specs

47 component manufacturers across 8 categories and 11 countries — actuators, harmonic drives, dexterous hands, batteries, onboard compute and sensors. These are the suppliers and cost drivers behind the specifications the index scores. Profiled and cited, not ranked.

Browse parts & manufacturers →

Benchmarks — and the gap

3 standardized benchmark protocols are registered, and not one robot has a published result under any of them. Every HMX score is computed from disclosed specifications, never a measured run. That gap is shown rather than papered over.

See the benchmark registry →

An open standard, in draft

The Humanoid Interop Standard proposes one machine-readable way to describe a robot's capabilities so an LLM controller can command any compliant machine. Layer 0 is live — every robot here already emits a manifest — and the whole dataset is readable as public JSON.

Read the draft →

What the index rewards

Capability over choreography

Autonomy is the heaviest pillar (25%). Teleoperation starts at 35 points and can reach 48 with AI and compute bonuses. Overall ranking also depends on the other five pillars; it does not establish autonomous task performance.

Hands do the work

Manipulation & dexterity carry 20%. High-DoF, tactile, dexterous hands with real payload separate robots that walk around from robots that do the job.

Shipping beats slideware

Commercial readiness (15%) combines product maturity with recorded deployment mentions. Consult the deployment ledger for evidence: legacy mentions are unverified and do not establish paid or active production.

Every number is cited

Robot profiles include source links and a confidence grade. Evidence quality varies: multiple links do not guarantee independent support for every specification. Consult the sources and confidence notes before comparing.

humanoidmetric.com in 2026: the index at a glance

humanoidmetric.com scores 156 humanoid robots and 19 robots in 8 other categories, from 93 companies. 74 of the humanoids are shipping to customers; the other 82 are in pilots, prototypes, research platforms or retired, and the index scores that difference rather than the announcement.

In the last 30 days 25 robots have joined the index, most recently Xiao Di (BYD), Kangaroo (PAL Robotics) and Optimus Gen 2 (Tesla). Each is held to the same two-independent-sources standard before it is ranked.